Tenth Doctor (
neverwouldiever) wrote2014-09-23 07:38 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Kiss Kiss Bang Bang and other Sounds
The adventures of John Hart and Jack Harkness, sometimes guest-starring the Doctor.


Sexting Meme threads:
Doctor and John
Jack and John
Doctor and Jack


Sexting Meme threads:
Doctor and John
Jack and John
Doctor and Jack
no subject
Again, here I'd have thought you'd like showing off.
no subject
Not showing off for you. I don't need to impress you nor do I want to.
no subject
What, no impressive ramming?
no subject
You want to fuck and I can make it as impressive as you want. But you'll never be up for it.
no subject
So what's the problem? Ianto's are high too?
no subject
Why? Looking to ask to join in? Cause it sounds like he and Jack are on hiatus right now.
no subject
Why is that? What did Jack do?
no subject
He's been very bad. He won't commit. It's not a shock, really. Who commits any more?
no subject
I'm sure your presence has been very helpful to the situation. And you're in the twenty-first century, they're still very much attached to that. It's not a bad thing.
no subject
Oh yeah, I'm a treat. They both adore me. Personally, I don't see the issue. Monogamy doesn't work, look at the history of the universe. All anyone does is cheat, fucks around and falls in love a lot.
no subject
That's a pretty human-centric view for a 51st century man. I'd say it depends on the species and moreover the individual. Not everyone is that interested in fucking, for instant.
no subject
Who said I was talking about humans? I've seen it in every race. Every single one. Humans I admired because hell, they try. They're just horny sods, it's rarely emotional just a desperate compulsion. I mean it's not always fucking, even the most asexual race cheats on their partner with someone else. It's not really a sexual thing, I think it's greed. We all want more than we have.
no subject
I think it's in the eye of the beholder, as so many things. At any rate, would you even see it as cheating? Mostly polysexual and polyromantic around your time, aren't they?
no subject
I never said non-monogamous couples, did I? Of course they're less likely to cheat, they've got more to do. It's people who commit in pairs I don't get. I've never been in a relationship with just two, always seemed a little lacking. Goes against nature, like I said.
no subject
The going against nature argument has been idiotic any time it ever got brought up. You're all part of nature, there is no going against it.
Well. With science there is.
no subject
I guess it depends but there are some things you can argue are officially going against nature. Like suppressing your sexuality or trying to eat things that will blatantly kill you. That can be going against it.
no subject
I suppose so. But I can't see Jack suppressing anything. I don't think it would kill him to stick to one species, gender and person for a few years. If that's what he wants to do.
no subject
Sounds very limiting. I doubt he'd go for it, personally. It's Jack, he wants everyone unconditionally. You either learn to accept it or move on.
no subject
And which one of those two are you doing?
no subject
I accepted it when I met him. We've always been open.
no subject
So not moving on?
no subject
I did that after we stopped shagging.
no subject
So he moved on first.
no subject
Couldn't say. He left the agency and we lost touch, wasn't really a proper parting.
no subject
I met him after that then. During the London Blitz. Been a while. Different face.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)